PHMSA letter of interpretation

Air Bag Packaging

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration · Feb 6, 1997 · Reference No. 97-0183

PHMSA says to use caution with this letter. On January 8th, 2015, PHMSA published Final Rule HM-215M which amended the HMT entries for UN3268 and UN0503. To align with International regulations, the proper shipping name of Air bag inflators, or Air bag modules, or Seat-belt pretensioners was changed to UN3268, Safety devices, electrically initiated and UN0503, Safety devices, pyrotechnic. In addition, the packing group was removed for both entries.

Interprets: 49 CFR § 173.166(e)

Reggie’s quick take

A company asked whether it can ship air bag inflators in any packaging listed in § 173.166(e). The agency said no. A shipper may only use the packaging that was tested and classified under § 173.166(b), unless its EX-approval letter names other packagings. Anyone who wants more packaging options must reapply to the Office of Hazardous Materials Approvals with added technical information. If approved, the EX-approval letter would be reissued to list the new packagings.

Written by AI (Claude) on Oct 22, 2026. Robots make mistakes and leave things out, so the letter below is what counts. Not legal advice.

This is in response to your recent inquiry concerning authorized packagings for Air bag inflators. You indicated that you believe the condition or form in which the inflators are packed during the performance of tests conducted under test series 6(c) of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Second Edition, is the only authorized packaging for the articles when subsequently offered for transportation. You further stated that your shipping department personnel maintain that any packaging authorized for air bag inflators in 49 CFR 173.166(e) can be used.

You are correct. Without specific authorization of alternative packagings in your EX-approval letter, your shipping department may not make substitutions in any of the packagings that were examined and classified as for transport under §173.166(b). It was intended that the shipper pre-select from the packagings authorized in §173.166(e), one or more combinations of packagings of the articles to be examined for classification by one of the procedures prescribed. Upon re-application to the Office of Hazardous Materials Approvals with supplemental technical information, alternative packaging combinations other than those originally classified may be authorized. In that case, your EX-Approval letter would be re-issued with the additional authorized packaging noted below the assigned classification.

A letter of interpretation applies the regulations to the facts the requester described. It isn’t a regulation and isn’t legal advice. The agency’s copy.