PHMSA letter of interpretation

Applicability of security plan requirements

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration · Aug 12, 2008 · Reference No. 08-0076

PHMSA says to use caution with this letter. Not on website Criteria for security plans revised. See HM-232F (75 FR 10974; March 9, 2010).

Interprets: 49 CFR § 172.504(f)(9)

This responds to your March 19, 2008 letter requesting clarification concerning the applicability of security plan requirements to certain shipments of hazardous materials under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask if the security plan requirements apply to low volume shipments that do not pose a security risk.

Currently, the security plans requirements in Subpart I of Part 172 of the HMR apply to persons who offer for transportation or transport:

(1) A highway-route controlled quantity of a Class 7 (radioactive) material;
(2) More than 25 kg (55 lbs.) of a Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 (explosive) material;
(3) More than 1 L (1.06 qt.) per package of a material poisonous by inhalation in Hazard Zone A;
(4) A shipment in a bulk packaging with a capacity equal to or greater than 13,248 L (3,500 gallons) for liquids or gases greater than 13.24 cubic meters (468 cubic feet) for solids;
(5) A shipment in other than a bulk packaging of 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs.) gross weight or more of one class of hazardous materials for which placarding is required;
(6) A select agent or toxin regulated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under 42 CFR Part 73 and, by April 1, 2007, a select agent or toxin regulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture under 9 CFR Part 121; or
(7) A shipment that requires placarding under Subpart F of Part 172 of the HMR.

Note that for shipments that do not require a placard under the HMR, a security plan is not required even if the shipment must be placarded under international regulations. For example, a shipment that requires a Class 9 placard for international transportation is not subject to the security plan requirements if the shipment is excepted from placarding in accordance with § 172.504(f)(9). Similarly, a person who offers for transportation or transports a shipment that is subject to placarding under the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code is not required to have a security plan if that shipment is not also subject to placarding under the HMR.

We are currently developing a notice of proposed rulemaking under Docket No. HM-232F, which is proposing to revise the list of materials for which hazardous materials transportation security plans are required. The proposed rule will be published in the near future.

A letter of interpretation applies the regulations to the facts the requester described. It isn’t a regulation and isn’t legal advice. The agency’s copy.