PHMSA letter of interpretation

MOTS by air

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration · Oct 29, 2007 · Reference No. 07-0190

Interprets: 49 CFR § 173.6

Reggie’s quick take

A company that ships aircraft maintenance materials asked whether the Materials of Trade (MOTs) exception covers its employees hauling hazardous materials and aircraft parts that contain hazardous materials. PHMSA said yes for travel by public road in company-owned and employee-owned vehicles, as long as all conditions in § 171.8 and § 173.6 are met. The exception does not cover hazardous materials sent by aircraft. Those shipments must follow § 173.27, Part 175, and any rules for the specific material. The company also is treated as a private motor carrier when its employees haul MOTs by road under the HMR.

Written by AI (Claude) on Oct 22, 2026. Robots make mistakes and leave things out, so the letter below is what counts. Not legal advice.

This is in response to your September 24, 2007 telephone conversation with a member of my staff and your September 27, 2007 letter concerning the Materials of Trade (MOTs) definition and exceptions prescribed in § 171.8 and 173.6, respectively, of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). You ask if the MOTs exception applies when your employees transport hazardous materials and equipment containing hazardous materials by public road in company-owned and employee-owned motor vehicles, and by aircraft if your employees accompany these materials to their destination. You state these materials and parts will be used to maintain or repair AirTran Airways aircraft and equipment. We have paraphrased your questions and answered them in the order provided.

Q1. May our employees use company-owned and employee-owned motor vehicles to transport hazardous materials and airplane parts that contain hazardous materials from an off-site location to an airport hangar or gate under the MOTs exceptions prescribed in § 173.6? If we transport these materials by aircraft and our employees accompany these items to their destination, do they qualify for the MOTs exception?

Al. The MOTs exception applies to transportation in commerce by motor vehicle only on public roads and highways. It does not apply to hazardous materials offered or intended for transportation by aircraft. Therefore, provided all applicable provisions in § 171.8 and 173.6 are met; your company may use the MOTs exception to transport hazardous materials and equipment containing hazardous materials in company-owned and employee-owned motor vehicles.

When transporting these materials by aircraft, your company must package and transport them in conformance with the HMR's general requirements for transportation by aircraft prescribed in § 173.27, requirements for carriage of hazardous materials by aircraft prescribed in Part 175, and any additional applicable requirements specific to the hazardous material. In addition, the HMR authorizes, with certain exceptions, compliance with the International Civil Aviation Organization's (ICAO's) Technical Instructions for the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air if the hazardous material is offered or intended for transportation by aircraft, and by motor vehicle either before or after being transported by aircraft. These provisions are contained in new Subpart C of Part 171 {72 FR 25161, 5/3/07, Docket No. PHMSA-2005-23141(HM-215F)]. This subpart incorporates and revises the HMR's provisions for the use of international standards that were previously contained in § § 171.11-171.12a.

Q2. In § 171.8 of the HMR, paragraph (3) in the definition of a MOT includes a "hazardous material, other than a hazardous waste, that is carried in a motor vehicle by a private motor carrier (including vehicles operated by a rail carrier) in direct support of a principal business that is other than transportation by motor vehicle." Does this mean that AirTran Airways is considered a private motor carrier when its employees transport MOTs in accordance with the HMR in company-owned and employee-owned motor vehicles?

A2. The answer is yes.

A letter of interpretation applies the regulations to the facts the requester described. It isn’t a regulation and isn’t legal advice. The agency’s copy.