"Virtually Identical" Packagings
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration · Oct 24, 2000 · Reference No. 00-0076
Interprets: 49 CFR § 178.601
Reggie’s quick take
A company that builds fiberboard boxes asked whether its box could be "virtually identical" to a competitor's tested and certified UN box if it matched the test report's Mullen burst strength, flute, size and style. PHMSA said no, because those traits are not enough. The boxes must match in structural design, size, material, wall thickness and manner of construction, or the box is a different packaging that needs its own design test. Linerboard from a different supplier can also be used, but only if the linerboard itself stays unchanged in those same respects.
Written by AI (Claude) on Oct 22, 2026. Robots make mistakes and leave things out, so the letter below is what counts. Not legal advice.
This is in response to your letter of February 29, 2000, requesting clarification of the phrase "virtually identical" as it pertains to UN standard packagings prescribed in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). You describe a scenario where your customer has a company construct a fiberboard box and test the design at its testing laboratory. This customer would now like your company to construct a fiberboard box that meets the standards for the box that was already tested and certified by your competitor's testing laboratory. The only characteristics of the fiberboard that are described in the test report are the Mullen burst strength, the flute, the size and the style. Your questions are paraphrased and answered as follows:
Q1. May the fiberboard box manufactured by your company be considered "virtually identical" to the fiberboard box used in the tested packaging if it meets all the characteristics described in the test report?
The answer is no. The test report you describe does not provide enough information on the fiberboard box to make the determination that your fiberboard box would be virtually identical. To be identical it must be established that the two boxes are the same with respect to structural design, size, material of construction, wall thickness and manner of construction. Unless you have sufficient information to duplicate the box as produced and tested, you would be producing a different packaging that must be design tested. Mullen burst strength, type of flute, size and style are not sufficiently descriptive to make this determination. In addition, in order to substitute fiberboard, the test documentation from the testing laboratory may not identify the fiberboard in terms of a specific manufacturer, and the agreement between the manufacturer, as identified through the certification marking, and the testing laboratory may not preclude substitution of components without recertification.
Q2. We have several linerboard suppliers. If we have a packaging tested and certified using linerboard made by one supplier, can we use another supplier's linerboard as long as we can verify that the new supplier's linerboard has the same characteristics as the original linerboard? By matching the characteristics listed in the Certification Testing Document, me we not virtually identical?
Linerboard from various manufacturers may be used if the linerboard is not changed, i.e., there is no change in structural design, size, material of construction, wall thickness and manner of construction. Again, Mullen burst strength, type of flute, size and style are not sufficiently descriptive to make this determination.
A letter of interpretation applies the regulations to the facts the requester described. It isn’t a regulation and isn’t legal advice. The agency’s copy.